2006 Supreme(All) 2596
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Prafulla C.Pant
TEERATH SINGH
Versus
STATE
Decided On : 18 September 2006
Criminal Appeal No. 321 of 2001, With Criminal Appeal No. 322 of 2001 and Criminal Appeal No. 287 of 2002
The court reiterated the principle that in a case of dacoity, it is not necessary for convicting the accused that he must have been named in the first information report. The court also held that where an accused on his own volition refuses to participate in a test identification parade, the prosecution cannot be blamed for not holding it.
Headnote:
CRIMINAL APPEAL - [KEYWORD] - [SUBJECT] - [ACT SECTION LIST] - [SUMMARY]
Fact of the Case:
This case involves three criminal appeals arising from the same judgment and order passed by the trial court in a case of dacoity and theft of an ashtha Dhatu (eight metal) idol from the Archeological Museum in Jageshwar Temple, District Almora. The appellants, Kabul Singh, Raj Kumar, Teerath Singh, Jaswant Singh, Man Singh, and Surta Nand Nautiyal, were convicted under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), including dacoity, theft, and receiving stolen property.
Finding of the Court:
The trial court found the appellants guilty of the offenses charged and sentenced them accordingly. The appellants challenged their convictions and sentences in the High Court.
Issues: The main issues before the High Court were: 1. Whether the prosecution had proved the guilt of the appellants beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. Whether the trial court had erred in its findings and conclusions. 3. Whether the sentences imposed by the trial court were appropriate.
Ratio Decidendi: The High Court examined the evidence presented by the prosecution and the defense and found that the prosecution had established the guilt of the appellants beyond a reasonable doubt. The court relied on the testimonies of eyewitnesses, circumstantial evidence, and the recovery of the stolen idol to support its findings. The court also rejected the arguments raised by the appellants and held that the trial court had not erred in its findings and conclusions.
Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeals of Jaswant Singh and Raj Kumar, upholding their convictions and sentences for the offenses of dacoity, theft, and receiving stolen property. However, the court partly allowed the appeal of Kabul Singh, setting aside his conviction and sentence for the offense of receiving stolen property. The court found that the prosecution had failed to prove that Kabul Singh had received the stolen idol, and therefore, his conviction for that offense could not be sustained.
2. All these three criminal appeals, preferred under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity hereinafter Cr. PC.), are directed against the judgment and order dated 09-09-1985, passed in C. B. I. Case No. 170 of 1975, C. B. I. Case No. 79 of 1976 and C. B. I. Case No. 138 of 1977, by learned Special Judge, Anti Corrup tion/additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun, whereby the appellant Kabul Singh is convicted under Section 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity hereinafter I. PC.), appellant Raj Kumar is convicted under Section 395,412 and 414 of I. PC. , and each of the appellants Teerath Singh, Jaswant Singh, Man Singh and Surta Nand Nautiyal, is convicted under Section 412 and 414 of the I. P. C. Appellant Kabul Singh is sentenced under Section 395 of I. P. C. to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of which, he is directed to undergo further six months rigorous imprisonment. He (Ka bul Singh) is also sentenced under Sec tion 412 of I. P. C. to undergo rigorous im prisonment for four years and to pay fine of Rs. 3,000/-, in default of pay ment of which, he is directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for further period of three months. Sentence awarded to appellant Raj Kumar under Section 395 and 412 of I. P. C. is the same as that of appellant Kabul Singh. He (Raj Kumar) is also sentenced under Section 414 of I. P. C. to undergo rigorous impris onment for a period of two years. Each of the appellants Teerath Singh, Jaswant Singh, Man Singh and Surta Nand Nautiyal, is sentenced under Sec tion 412 of I. P. C. to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay fine of Rs. 3,000/- in default of payment of which, each one of them is directed to undergo further three months rigorous imprisonment. Each one of these four appellants is also sentenced under Sec tion 414 of I. P. C. to undergo rigorous im prisonment for a period of two years. Sentences are directed by the trial court to run concurrently.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the entire record.
PROSECUTION STORY :
4. Prosecution story, in brief, is that a dacoity was committed in the interven ing night of 9th and 10th October, 1974, in the Archeological Museum situated at Jageshwar Temple, District Almora. It is alleged by the prosecution that some 9-10 persons including accused Raj Kumar, Bali Ram (died during trial), Surta Nand Nautiyal (died during the period of appeal), Kabul Singh, one Jagdish Bahadur Saxena and Virendra Pal Singh along with others participated in the dacoity on said date. P. W. 21 Keshav Dutt Bhatt (informant), the Chowkidar of the Museum of Archeo-1ogical Survey of India (hereinafter re ferred as A. S. I.) was assaulted by the dacoits at the time of commission of dacoity, and his hands and feet were tied with ropes and his mouth gagged with piece of cloth. He was threatened at the point of knife that he would be killed if he dared to raise alarm. The said Chowkidar was confined by the dacoits in a small room before they left the place of incident. P. W. 21 Keshav Dutt Bhatt, the Chowkidar sustained injuries in the accident. According to the prosecution story, dacoits broke open the doors of the godown of the Museum, and decamped with an ashtha Dhatu (eight metal) idol (material Ext. 3) of PAWAN RAJA. The said idol was 4 feet 6 inches in height and 112 kilograms in weight. P. W. 21 Keshav Dutt Bhatt lodged the First Information Report (Ext. A-72) of the incident in the morning, at about 9:45 A. M. , on 10-10-1974, with Police Station Almora, which is at a distance of some 40 kilometers from Jageshwar Temple. In said report he mentioned that one of the bandits was Baram Singh, who was known to him. Initially, the investigation was with rev enue police