The judgment emphasized the legal principle that the acquisition of alternate accommodations by the tenant extinguished his right to continue in possession of the disputed accommodation, and every adult family member has a right to settle down in independent business.

Notice on respondent No. 3-tenant has been deemed to be sufficient by order of this Court dated 4-9- 2006. No counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 3. Respondent No. 4 is formal party but has filed a counter- affidavit.

2. Heard Counsel for the petitioner, Counsel for the respondent No. 4 and the Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Also perused record.

3. This is landlords petition challenging the validity and correctness of judgment dated 17-11-2004 (Annexure 5 to the writ petition) passed by Additional Sessions Judge/fast Track Court No. 3, Muzzaffarnagar and judgment and order dated 31-3-2003 (Annexure 3 to the writ petition) passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kairana District Muzaffarnagar.

4. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that late Kuldeep Singh, father of petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 was landlord of the disputed accommodation. He together with his family members was residing in the upper storey of the building. There are four shops on the ground floor. Mohd. Salif alias Mando son of Sri Kalamuddin-respondent No. 3 is tenant of one of the shops situated just beside the stairs of the residence of the petitioners.

5. The case of the petitioners is that the vacant place lying behind the shop in possession of respondent No. 3 is in dispute. Sri Satnam Singh is degree holder of computer education and he is in need to set up computer education centre for his livelihood, as such, release application under Section 21 (1) (a) of he U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was filed before the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Kairana. The application was registered as S. C. C. Case No. 19 of 1998.

6. The case was contested by the tenant-respondent No. 3 denying the plaint allegations on the ground that the petitioner- landlords are not in bona-fide need of the disputed accommodation.

7. The release application of the petitioner was ultimately dismissed vide judgment and order dated 31- 3-2003 by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kairana holding that:

@hindi = "jeeoeriece keer Deesj mes ceeveveere Ge veeeeuee Fueeneyeeo keer leerve Deve vepeerj oeefkeue keer ieeer nw~ S0 Sue0 Deej0 2000 (38) Hespe 664, lelee pes0 meer0 Sue0 Deej0 2000 (2) Hespe 532 lelee S0 Sue0 Deej0 1999 (35) Hespe 774 oeefkeue keer ief& nw~ cesjs eje GHejese vepeerjew kee Dejeueeskeve efkeee ieee~ ceeveveere Ge veeeeuee eje Fve vepeerjew cew en efjeefoe Jejemlee eefleheeefole keer ief& nw efke Oeeje 21 2000 (21) (S) kes Devleie≤ efkejeesoej kees otmeje mleeve GHeueyoe ve nesves kes Deeoeej Hej eele&veehe$e Keeefjpe vener efkeee peeesiee~ cesjs eje GHejese vepeerjew kee Dejeueeskeve efkeee ieee~ Fve efjeefoe Jejemleedeew kes lele emlegle Jeeo kes leleew mes vener efceueles nw~ Deefvlece efjeefoe Jejemlee kes lele en Les efke Yetefce mjeeceer kes yees ye[w nes iees Les Deewj Gmekes ue[kes Je ue[keer kees jnves kes efues Deueie Deueie kecejs keer Deejemekelee Leer Fmeefues Yetmjeeceer keer meoyeeefjeke Deejemekelee ceeveer ieeer~ emlegle Jeeo ogkeeve kes mecyevoe cew nw Dele: Ge efjeefoe Jejemlee Jeeoeriece kees ueeye vener Hengbelee nw~

@hindi = eeflejeeoer ves Deheves eeflejeeo He$e lelee oeefkeue Mehelehe$e cew en keleve efkeee nw efke eeleea veb0 1 yeqke cew veewkejer kejlee nw lelee Gmeves ^sefvebie osves kes efues keesf& keesme& vener efkeee nw lelee Jeeoeriece kes Heeme efjejeeefole ogkeeve kes Heers pees Yeeie esceebo keer efkejeesoejer Jeeuee Lee Jen Keeueer neskej efceue ieee nw~ esceevo ves Yeer Deheves Mehelehe$e cew keleve efkeee nw lelee Jeeoeriece ves Ge mleeve kees Deheves keypes cew nesvee keleve efkeee nw~ Ge mleeve 15 Heg x 30 Heg kee nw~ Jeeoer meb0 1 eje Deheves Mehelehe$e cew iewme meefje&me cew veewkejer kejvee Yeer kene nw neueebefke Demleef& He mes kejvee kene nw Deewj Jeeo cew Mehelehe$e cew iewme kecheveer mes veewkejer es[ves kee keleve efkeee nw~ eeleea veb0 1 kes Deve Yeef& kees

Deheves ceecee kes meneb ^wkej