ASHOK BHUSHAN
Ram Dhyan, Balalu – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation – Respondent
( 1 ) SECOND supplementary affidavit filed today is accepted on record. Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri Himanshu Shekher and Sri Anuj Kumar learned Counsel for the respondents.
( 2 ) BY this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 18. 1. 2006 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation by which the revision No. 486 filed by Shivjor and other contesting respondents has been allowed.
( 3 ) BRIEF facts necessary for deciding the writ petition are;
( 4 ) THE dispute relate to plot No. 439 situate in village Uchagaon, Pargana Nizamabad, Tahsil sadar District Azamgarh. The contesting respondents are original tenure holders of the plot and the said plot is said to be adjoining the road. The plot was kept out of consolidation proceedings. Subsequently on an application filed by the co-tenure holders of the said plot, an order was passed by the Consolidation Officer on 29. 3. 1988 valuing the plot No. 439 at 40 paisa and after the said plot being valued, a Chak was proposed in favour of the petitioner by Assistant consolidation Officer on 31. 1. 1992. The contesting respondents after coming to know that the plot No. 439 has been valued a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.