SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 504

ASHOK BHUSHAN
Ram Dhyan, Balalu – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation – Respondent


Advocates:
ANUJ KUMAR, HIMANSHU SHEKHAR, RAJIV KUMAR MISHRA, Ved Byas Mishra,

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) SECOND supplementary affidavit filed today is accepted on record. Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri Himanshu Shekher and Sri Anuj Kumar learned Counsel for the respondents.

( 2 ) BY this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 18. 1. 2006 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation by which the revision No. 486 filed by Shivjor and other contesting respondents has been allowed.

( 3 ) BRIEF facts necessary for deciding the writ petition are;

( 4 ) THE dispute relate to plot No. 439 situate in village Uchagaon, Pargana Nizamabad, Tahsil sadar District Azamgarh. The contesting respondents are original tenure holders of the plot and the said plot is said to be adjoining the road. The plot was kept out of consolidation proceedings. Subsequently on an application filed by the co-tenure holders of the said plot, an order was passed by the Consolidation Officer on 29. 3. 1988 valuing the plot No. 439 at 40 paisa and after the said plot being valued, a Chak was proposed in favour of the petitioner by Assistant consolidation Officer on 31. 1. 1992. The contesting respondents after coming to know that the plot No. 439 has been valued a















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top