SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 700

RAJESH TANDON
JAGDISH CHANDRA JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates:
P.S.Rawat,

RAJESH TANDON, J.

Heard Sri R. S. Rawat, learned coun sel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retiral dues and all benefits to the petitioner.

3. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has al ready retired and the retiral benefits and other dues have not been given to the petitioner, hence the writ petition may be disposed of at the admission stage.

4. In view of the aforesaid state ment made by the petitioner, the re spondents are directed to release the retiral benefits and all other dues to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from the filing of the certified copy of the order.

5. A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner was charge sheeted of his alleged misconduct for unauthorizedly issuing experience cer tificates to various persons that they have worked on daily wages basis in the department for a certain period. A departmental inquiry was conducted against the petitioner in which the petitioner was found guilty and he was awarded punishment with stoppage of three increments.

6. Now the petition




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top