SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 774

S.N.SRIVASTAVA
RAJA RAM – Appellant
Versus
DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION SIDDHARTH NAGAR – Respondent


Advocates:
R.P.Dubey,

S. N. SRIVASTAVA, J.

In this peti tion, challenge is to the order dated 19-12-2005 passed by Deputy Directory consolidation, Sidharthnagar in revision whereby order dated 28-11-2001 passed by Settlement Officer Con solidation, Sidharthnagar in Appeal No. 622 and 623 under Section 11 (1) of the U. P Consolidation of Holdings Act was affirmed.

2. The dispute revolves round plot Nos. 159 admeasuring 1/0-034,159 ad measuring 2/0-082, 137 admeasuring 2/0-044 and 209 admeasuring 2/0-053 situated in village Bishanupur Ahedmali, Tappa- Chawara, Pargana Basi East, District Sidharthnagar. It would appear that in the basic year Awadu, Parushram and Pachu sons of Kaipa Veva Vindashvaree were rocorded as Bhumidhars. To begin with, an objec tion was filed by Pachu and other con testing Opp. parties 3 to 6 seeking division of the land in dispute on the ground that Kalpa was spirited away by death and her property had devolved upon them. Another set of objection was filed by petitioners claiming rights on the basis of possession spanning about 30 years-otherwise than in ac cordance with law-attended with prayer that they be declared as Bhumidhar on the basis of possession and the names of recorded















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top