SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 796

G.P.SRIVASTAVA
Surendra Singh, Jagdish Singh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
ALOK KUMAR YADAV, Virendra Kumar Singh,

G. P. SRIVASTVA, J.

( 1 ) I have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution case the applicant Fired upon the injured with intention to cause his death. The injury report shows that there are four injuries. The injury No. 1 which is side top on the left inguinal region just below down the inguinal ligament was Sound grievous in nature as a result of which the injured was unable to discharge urine and night soil in a natural way. It is being done artificially by fixing bags, in the circumstances of the case 1 am of the view that the applicant does not deserve bail. The application is rejected.


. .

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top