PRAFULLA C.PANT
RAKESH MOHAN PUROHIT – Appellant
Versus
LAXMAN SINGH RAWAT – Respondent
2. Brief facts of the case are that a suit was filed by plaintiff/respondent for recovery of Rs. 78, 500/- from the defendant/appellant. As per the plaint case, the plaintiff is a retired Range Of ficer and defendants father was his col league. On 10-09-1995, defendant took a loan of Rs. 50, 000/- from the plain tiff through Cheque No. 27307 dated 10-09-1995 and executed a pronote and a receipt. According to the plain tiff, the defendant purchased a vehicle by a loan taken from a bank and for repayment of said loan to the bank, the aforesaid amount was taken from the plaintiff. However, when on 29-01- 1998, the plaintiff demanded repay ment by sending a notice, the defend ant failed to repay the loan. As such, the plaintiff instituted a suit for recov ery of money with interest.
3. Defendant contested the suit be fore the trial court and filed his written statement. However, he admitted hav i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.