KRISHNA MURARI
HASAN RAZA – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION – Respondent
Heard Sri S. C. Verma learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Tripathi B. G. Bhai for contesting respondent Nos. 2 to 4.
2. The dispute relates to plot No. 993 situate in village Gajehra, Tahsil Bansi, District Basti. In the basic year the said plot was recorded in the name of the petitioners. An objection under Section 9-A (2) of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (for short the Act) was filed on the ground that they have perfected their rights as sirdar on the basis of long possession and the name of the petitioners is wrongly recorded and is liable to be expunged. The claim was contested by the petitioners on the ground that they were in possession of the land in dispute since the time of their ancestor and their father be-came Adhivasi and thereafter sirdar. It was further pleaded that the father of the petitioners was declared Adhivasi under the provisions of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act and the compensation was received by respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and since no objection was filed by them under Section 240 (G) of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act, their claim of Sirdari is barred.
3. It is undisputed that the father of the petitioners had filed s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.