VINOD PRASAD
Ata Ullaha Mohd. Hadi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Sri G. S. Hazela Advocate, counsel for the applicants and the learned A. G. A. on behalf of respondent State. As the facts are not disputed and the argument of the counsel for the applicant is confined only on the impugned order dated 6. 3. 06, passed by I/c ACJM (Railways), farrukhabad, in case No. 378a of 05 State v. Masrruddin, therefore this stage itself as has been agreed between both the parties.
( 2 ) THE facts stated lies in a narrow compass. A, NCR No. 60 of 05 was registered at the instance of one Mohd. Hanif at the police station Jahanganj, District Farrukhabad on 17. 8. 05 at 2. 30 PM under Sections 323/504/506 IPC against four persons as malefactors namely Mazruddin, bashruddin, Muzzavil, and Wasin in respect of an incident alleged to have taken place on 17. 8. 2005 at 1. 15 PM. The incident was regarding abusing filthy and beating by lathis and dandas by the accused to the brother of the informant namely Noor Mohd. On 1. 9. 05 an application was filed by the informant to convert the said NCR into offence under Sections 323/504/506/308 IPC before Superintendent of Police Fatehgarh. This application was accompanied by medical report dated 17.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.