SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 1091

ARUN TANDON
Sangam Lal Sonar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Sales Tax – Respondent


Advocates:
BHARAT JI AGRAWAL, PIYUSH AGRAWAL,

ARUN TANDON, J.

( 1 ) IN respect of the Assessment Year 1975-76 on the basis of certain documents recovered from m/s. Kaka Saheb Nana Saheb, (a third party) as well as on other material taxable turn over of the petitioner was fixed at Rs. 6 lakhs while tax liability of the petitioner was determined at Rs. 12,0007- under order of the Assessing Authority dated 30. 1. 1980.

( 2 ) FEELING aggrieved by the said order the assessee preferred an Appeal under Section 9 of the u. P. Trade Tax Act. The Appeal was allowed under the order of the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial) dated 28. 4. 1983 and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Authority with the following directions: is Sambandh Mein Bikrikar Adhikari Ko Chahiye Tha Ki Kaka Saheb Nana Saheb Nanak firm Se Pooch Tachh Karke Yah Nishit Karte Ki Chandi Ke Is Indraj Vastav Mein Kis vyakti Se Sambandhit The. Kar Nirdharan Patravali Ke Avlokan Se Spasht Hota Hal Ki aisi Koi Pooch Tachh Nahin Ki Gavi. Atah Nyay Ki Drishti Se Yah Uchit Hoga Ki Case punah Bikrikar Adhikari Ko Remand Kiva Jaye. Kar Nirdharan Adhikari Ne Kaka Saheb nana Sahed Namak Firm Se Pratinidhi Ko Bulakar Is Indraj Ke Sambandh Mein Pooch tachh Karen Tatha Yah Nishchit M











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top