SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(All) 1585

VINOD PRASAD
PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates:
M.K.Gupta, Ram Babu Sharma, Wahabin Islam,

VINOD PRASAD, J.

The present application has been filed by Pradeep Kumar, Rajeev Kumar, Vinay Kumar, Dharma Veer and Rajesh, with the prayer to set aside the judgment and order dated 4-2-2006, passed by Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, E. C. Act, Bulandshahr, in criminal revision No. 482/05, Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. State of U. P. The applicants have also prayed for setting aside the order dated 16-8-2005 passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st, Bulandshahr in case No. 1765/05 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 395 IPC, P. S. Dibai, District Bulandshahr. By the aforesaid order dated 16-8-2005, the Judicial Magistrate has summoned the applicants for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506 and 395 IPC and vide impugned order dated 4-2-2006 the Additional Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, E. C. Act, Bulandshahr has rejected the revision filed by the accused challenging the aforesaid summoning order passed by the Judicial Magistrate As the present applicants were summoned as an accused and their revision before the lower revisional Court was also rejected, hence this application under Section 482 Cr. P. C. for quashing of both the orders.

2. The Facts encapsula




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top