SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 264

BARKAT ALI ZAIDI
HARISH CHANDRA PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates:
M.C.GUPTA, Mohd.Israil Siddiqui,

B. A. ZAIDI, J.

The aforenoted two applications have been filed by the abovenoted two applicants praying that order dated 6. 12. 2007 passed by Honble Mr. Justice M. K. Mittal by which, his Lordship dismissed in default their Crl. Misc. Transfer Application Nos. 553 of 2007 and 554 of 2007, be set aside, they be restored and decided on merits after hearing the parties.

2. Heard Sri Mukesh Chand Gupta, Advocate for the applicants and Mohd. Israil Siddiqui, Addl. Government Advocate for the State.

3. It may be noticed from the record, that besides these transfer applications, which were respectively for transfer of the Criminal Misc. Case Nos. 612 of 2007 and 613 of 2007 pending in the Court of 1st Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura to some other districts, one of the applicant Harish Chandra Pathak had also filed five applications, given below, under section 482 Cr. P. C.

1. Criminal Misc. Application No. 13605 of 2007 2. Criminal Misc. Application No. 16603 of 2007 3. Criminal Misc. Application No. 13607 of 2007 4. Criminal Misc. Application No. 16602 of 2007 5. Criminal Misc. Application No. 13606 of 2007 4. With regard to these cases in which above applications were filed tw









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top