SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 327

B.C.KANDPAL
LAXMAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Lokendra Dobhal,

By way of this petition under Sec tion 482 of Cr. P. C. the petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 24-11-2003, passed by Special Judicial Magistrate, Didihat, District Pithoragarh in Criminal Case No. 23 of 2003 Smt. Durga Devi vs. Laxman Singh as well as judgment and order dated 19-7-2004 passed by Sessions Judge, Pithoragarh in criminal revision no. 17 of 2003 Laxman Singh vs. Smt. Durga Devi.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is the husband of respond ent no. 2. An application under Section 125 of Cr. PC. was filed by respondent no. 2 on 10-6-1992 before Judicial Mag istrate, 1st, Didihat, District Pithoragarh, for maintenance. The learned Magistrate allowed the application vide order dated 16-4-1998 and awarded the mainte nance of Rs. 300/- per month to respond ent no. 2. As the petitioner could not make the payment of certain amount of maintenance to respondent no. 2,

therefore, respondent no. 2 moved an appli cation under Section 125 (3) of Cr. P. C. on 5-12-2000 in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Didihat, District Pithoragarh for recovery of Rs. 30,3007 -. This appli cation was allowed vide order dated 24-11-2003 by the Judicial Magistrate a















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top