B.C.KANDPAL
LAXMAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is the husband of respond ent no. 2. An application under Section 125 of Cr. PC. was filed by respondent no. 2 on 10-6-1992 before Judicial Mag istrate, 1st, Didihat, District Pithoragarh, for maintenance. The learned Magistrate allowed the application vide order dated 16-4-1998 and awarded the mainte nance of Rs. 300/- per month to respond ent no. 2. As the petitioner could not make the payment of certain amount of maintenance to respondent no. 2,
therefore, respondent no. 2 moved an appli cation under Section 125 (3) of Cr. P. C. on 5-12-2000 in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Didihat, District Pithoragarh for recovery of Rs. 30,3007 -. This appli cation was allowed vide order dated 24-11-2003 by the Judicial Magistrate a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.