The consistency between eyewitness testimony, medical evidence, and other corroborating evidence is crucial in affirming a conviction.

This appeal, preferred under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Proce dure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr. P. C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 29-06-1990, passed by the then learned Sessions Judge, Nainital, in Sessions trial No. 160 of 1986, whereby all the four accused / ap pellants, namely Dayal Singh, Budh Singh, Resham Singh and Pahalwan Singh have been convicted under Sec tion 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as I. P. C.), and one punishable under Section 323 read with Section 34 of I. P. C. Each one of the convicts is sen tenced by the trial court to undergo im prisonment for life under Section 302 read with Section 34 of I. P. C. and rig orous imprisonment for a period of six months under Section 323 read with Section 34 of I. P. C.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the lower court record.

3. Prosecution story, in brief, is that in Village Salwati, within the limits of police station Starganj (now part of Dis trict Udham Singh Nagar) fields of complainant Gurmukh Singh (P. W. 2) and that of the accused / appellant Dayal Singh are adjoining. Their fields were separated by medh (boundary mound ). On 08-12-1985, Gurmukh Singh, P. W. 2 along with his father Pyara Singh (de ceased) had gone to their fields. At about 12:00 noon, Balwant Kaur (P. W. 3), wife of the deceased, came to the field with meals for her husband (Pyara Singh) and son (Gurmukh Singh ). Forty five minutes thereafter, accused / appellants Dayal Singh and his two sons Budh Singh and Resham Singh along with accused / appellant Pahalwan Singh, armed with lathies, reached to the field and started hurling abuses at Pyara Singh and Gurmukh Singh, rais ing objection as to why the boundary mound was disturbed. In reply to it, Pyara Singh told

the accused / appel lants that the boundary mound is joint of the parties. This infuriated the ac cused / appellants, who surrounded Pyara Singh and gave lathi blows to him. Pyara Singh fell down in the field and even thereafter, the accused / ap pellants gave lathi blows till he suc cumbed to the injuries, at the spot; Gurmukh Singh (P. W. 2) and Balwant Kaur (P. W. 4) came forward in an at tempt to rescue Pyara Singh. However, they were also inflicted lathi blows by the accused / appellants. Satnam Singh, who was ploughing a nearby field and P. W. 5 Uttam Singh, who was passing through the village on way to his home, witnessed the incident. They challenged the accused, on which the accused / appellants ran away from the place of incident. While fleeing, turban (Ext.-l) of accused / appellant Budh Singh fell on the spot. Gurmukh Singh, P. W. 2, leaving dead body of his father Pyara Singh at the spot went to the police sta tion along with tome other villagers and go the first information report (Ext. A-3) scribed by Kashmir Singh and lodged the same with Police Station Sitarganj, on the very day i. e. 08-12-1985, at about 02:15 RM. On the basis of said report Crime No. 354 of 1985 was reg istered against accused / appellants re lating to offence punishable under Sec tion 302 of I. P. C. Head Constable Inder Singh prepared the check report (Ext. A-4a) of the first information report and made necessary entry in the general di ary at SI. No. 25 (copy of extract of which is Ext. A-5, on the record) in the presence of Sub Inspector Kartar Singh (P. W. 6), who investigated the crime thereafter. The injuries of Gurmukh Singh, P. W. 2 and Balwant Kaur, P. W. 4, were examined on the very day i. e. 08-12-1985, at about 04:00 RM. , at Pri mary Health Center, Sitarganj by Dr. PC. Pandey (P. W. 1) where they were taken by Constable Rajendra Singh and Constable Virendra Singh. The Investi gating Officer, meanwhile, proceeded to the spot and in the presence of the wit nesses, including Balwant Singh (P. W. 8), prepared the inquest report (Ext. A-6) of the dead body of Pyara Singh, after taking the same in his possession. While p