AMAR SARAN
MUNNA LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent
Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and Sri Vinod Kumar Mishra, learned A. G. A. This application has been filed for challenging an order summoning the applicants along with some other accused by order dated 13. 9. 2007 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No. 1, Firozabad in Case No. 3078 of 2007 under sections 147, 353, 336, 427, 504, 506 IPC and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P. S. Sirsaganj, district Firozabad, and for quashing the criminal proceedings thereof.
2. Essentially one submission has been made that the summoning order dated 13. 9. 207 passed on a charge-sheet was on a printed proforma and it revealed lack of application of mind.
3. Learned Counsel for the applicants has placed reliance on a judgment passed by a Single Judge (Honble K. N. Sinha, J.) in the case of Chhaya William (Smt.) and others v. State of U. P. and another, 2003 (47) ACC 1017 that the summoning order must disclose application of mind. It may be mentioned that the said decision was passed when the summoning order was passed in a complaint case. The present case is a case of summoning all the accused-after submission of the charge-sheet and in a charge-sheet case
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.