SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 826

PRAFULLA C.PANT
SANJEEV BHATIA – Appellant
Versus
GEETA RANI – Respondent


Advocates:
Nagesh Agrawal, RATAN LAL,

PRAFULLA C. PANT, J.

This appeal, preferred under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is

directed against the judgment and decree dated 05-10-2007, passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Haridwar, in Original Suit No. 251 of 2003, whereby the appellants petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for divorce is dismissed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the lower court record.

3. Brief facts of the case are that appellant / husband filed a petition un der Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for divorce against his wife Smt. Geeta Rani (respondent) before the Prin cipal Judge, Family Court, Haridwar. It is pleaded by the appellant/husband in said petition that he got married to Geeta Rani (respondent) on 21-11-2001, following Hindu rites, in Haridwar. A fe male child was born out of the wedlock on 29-09-2002. It is further pleaded that petitioner / appellant runs a small gro cery shop in Haridwar and his father who is a retired officer from Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, assists him in the business. On the other hand respond ents mother Bhagwan Devi also used to run her shop of general merchant and. it is alleged that respondent














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top