SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 1284

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD
Versus
SHIMLA
Decided On : 11 June 2008
F. A. F. O. No. 2028 of 2008

Advocates:
Vivek Kumar Birla,

The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the term 'accident' under the Motor Vehicles Act and distinguishing between accidental murder and intentional murder.

Headnote:

accident - Motor Vehicles Act - 140, 163-A, 166 - The court discussed the definition of 'accident' as per various dictionaries and legal sources, and referred to a previous judgment to distinguish between accidental murder and intentional murder. The court concluded that the incident, which resulted in the death of the driver, can be termed as an accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, and the claimants are entitled to relief.

Fact of the Case:

The insurance company appealed the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, arguing that the incident resulting in the death of the driver cannot be construed as an accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, and raised concerns about the quantum of compensation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the incident, although resulting in the death of the driver, can be termed as an accident under the Motor Vehicles Act, and the claimants are entitled to relief. The appeal was dismissed.

Issues: The main issue was whether the incident resulting in the death of the driver can be considered an accident under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court referred to the definition of 'accident' as per various dictionaries and legal sources, and distinguished between accidental murder and intentional murder based on a previous judgment. The court concluded that the incident can be termed as an accident under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Final Decision: The appeal of the insurance company was dismissed, and the statutory deposit made before the court was allowed to be remitted back to the concerned Motor Accidents Claims tribunal for adjusting with the amount of compensation to be paid to the claimants.

AMITAVA LALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal of insurance company challenging the judgment and order dated 11. 4. 2008 passed by the concerned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jhansi.

( 2 ) THE main contention of the insurance company is that when the vehicle was running on a highway, Trade Tax authorities stopped the same and after parking at a particular point, the driver was beaten extensively, which caused his death. It appears to be State sponsored murder. Therefore, such an incident cannot be construed as an accident under Motor Vehicles act, 1988, arising out of use of motor vehicle. Apart from the aforesaid point, learned counsel appearing for insurance company raised the point of quantum of compensation on the basis of the income of Rs. 2,000 per month as per the oral evidence. But it is recorded under the judgment and order that no evidence was led by the insurance company. Therefore, having no denial or rebuttal, we cannot accept the argument of the insurance company ex facie. So far as the question of multiplier is concerned, it has been faintly raised by the insurance company, but no argument is advanced also to that extent. Therefore, the basic question is whether the above incident is an accident out of the use of motor vehicle or an incident simpliciter which can be termed as murder?

( 3 ) WE have heard the learned counsel at length to decide the said question of law at the stage of admission.

( 4 ) WE find that the definition of term accident is not defined in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, but we can construe the meaning of the word accident as contained in section 140 onwards, either in the case of no fault liability or the liabilities, which is required to be determined by the court under section 163-A or 166 of the Act and other sections, if any, connected therein.

( 5 ) ORDINARILY, the meaning of the word accident understood is as follows (defined in Dictionary by Murray, Vol. I-A):

"accident: 1. Anything that happens. . 1 + a. An occurrence, incident, event. Obs. B. Anything that happens without foresight or expectation; an unusual event, which proceeds from some unknown cause, or is an unusual effect of a known cause, a casualty, a contingency. "

( 6 ) SIMILARLY, the meaning of accident is as follows defined in the Law Lexicon dictionary, 1997 Edn. :

"accident: The word accident is constantly used in ordinary English and, therefore, in law, in two senses, one much wider than the other. Strictly an occurrence can only be said to be accidental when it is due neither to design nor to negligence. For, if an act be intentional it is clearly no accident; if it be the result of culpable negligence, then by due care it could have been avoided and the negligent person cannot be allowed to excuse himself by declaring it an accident. In this narrower sense of the word, an accident must be nobodys fault. 12 App Cas 526. The word accident generally denotes an event that takes place without ones foresight or expectation an event which proceeds from an unknown cause, or is an unusual effect of a known cause and, therefore, not expected chance-casualty, contingency (Webster Dictionary) an event happening without the concurrence of the will of the person by whose agency it was caused. It differs from mistake in that the latter always supposes the operation of the will of the agent in producing the event although that will is caused by an erroneous impression on the mind. "

( 7 ) FURTHER the meaning of accident as defined in Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th edn. , Centennial Edn. (1891-1991), is as follows:

"accident: The word accident is derived from the Latin verb accidere signifying fall upon befall, happen, chance. In an etymological sense anything that happens may be said to be an accident and in this sense, the word has been defined as befalling a change; a happening; an accident; an occurrence or event. In its most commonly accepted meaning, or in its ordinary or popular sense, the word may be defined as meaning: a fortuitous circ








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top