SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(All) 1642

V.K.GUPTA
UTTARAKHAND JAL VIDYUT NIGAM LTD – Appellant
Versus
RAPTI CONTRACTORS – Respondent


Advocates:
Sharad Sharma, VINAY KUMAR,

An agreement was executed on 24-02-2000 between U. P. Jal Vidyut Nigam, Lucknow, the predecessor in interest of the petitioners and the respondent for the construction work relating to Penstock, Anchor and Saddle blocks and Power House Building at Pilangad, M. H. S. (2x1125 kw) in District Uttarkashi.

2. Disputes having arisen between the parties with respect to the aforesaid agreement and the execution of the aforesaid work, on 27-09-2005, this Court in-Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (1996 Act for short) appointed Sri Justice I. P. Vashistha (Retd.) as the single Member Arbitral Tribunal. Later on, Sri Justice I. P. Vashistha was re placed by Sri Justice V. N. Mehrotra by an order dated 23-12- 2005 passed by this Court. The learned arbitrator gave his Award on 28-05-2007.

3. Whereas the petitioners herein dissatisfied with the Award, filed an ap plication U/s 34 of 1996 Act in the Court at Dehradun, the respondent herein also dissatisfied with the Award, filed an ap plication U/s 34 of 1996 Act on 24-08-2007 in the Court of District Judge, Uttarkashi. In the proceedings initiated by the respondent U/s 34 (Supra) be fore the District Judge, Uttarkashi, the petitioners herei












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top