SURENDRA SINGH, J.

This revision has been filed against the judgment and, order dated, 5. 8. 2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Saharanpur in Criminal Appeal No. 23/2007.

2. By the aforesaid appeal the Addi tional Sessions Judge has dismissed the appeal and confirmed the conviction and sentence of the revisionist, under sections 498-A and 406 IPC.

3. In short the allegations against the revisionist are that the complainant Smt. Achala Madan was married with the revi sionist on 13. 4. 1995. At the time of mar riage the parents of the victim have spent sufficient amount according to their capa bility. It has further been alleged that soon after the marriage, the revisionist, the hus band of the victim, Ram Prakash, the fa ther-in-law, Smt. Santosh, the Mother- in-law and Sangita, the Nanad of the victim started causing harassment to the victim for fulfilment of dowry and even on several occasions she was beaten badly and caused injuries by the aforesaid members of in-laws, for want of a Marati car or a Hero Honda motorcycle. The First Information Report regarding to the incident which took place on 13. 4. 1995 was lodged on 18. 5. 1998 at about 12. 20 p. m. It was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document