Mr. U. K. Uniyal, learned Senior Ad vocate with Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Ad vocate for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Nandan Arya, learned Assist ant Government Advocate for the re spondent-State

3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

4. A very short but interesting ques tion of law is involved for consideration, adjudication and determination in this bail application.

5. On 24th October, 2007, three persons were apprehended on the ba sis of information received that con traband was being carried by them. One of them was petitioner Baidev Singh from whose possession, as per the allegations in the First Information Report, 400 gms. of smack was recov ered. It is undisputed case of the par ties that 400 gms. of smack is a com mercial quantity. Any amount which is below 250 gms. is non-commercial quantity. The prosecution case is that out of recovered 400 gms. of the sub stance, 20 gms. (net wet) was sent for chemical examination to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Dehradun. As per the report of the chemical examina tion, the sample received in the Labo ratory gave a positive test for Diacetyl Morphine. In laymans language, the said sample gave a positive test for smack in chemical and chr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document