With the consent of learned coun sel for the parties this writ petition is being disposed of finally today itself at the motion hearing stage without it be ing formally admitted to hearing.

2. The controversy involved in this writ petition is very short as well as simple.

3. The facts, in brief, may first be noticed. The petitioner applied for se lection in the Uttarakhand Judicial Service in the examination as well as the selection process held and conducted by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission in the year 2008 for the post of Civil Judge (Jr. Div. ). The petitioners candidature was con sidered along with other eligible candi dates. She had appeared and qualified in preliminary examination and accord ingly was allowed to sit in the main written examination which she also qualified. Because of the merit ob tained by her in the main written examination, the petitioner was called for viva-voce/interview. It was at that stage that a disputed arose about her eligibility linked X with her domicile which ultimately to the cancella tion of her candidature.

4. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner has challenged this action of the re spondents in the present petition