SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 18

S.U.KHAN
Shardadeen – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
R.N.Singh, V.K.S.Chandel, V.K.SINGH,

S. U. KHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is directed against orders dated 15. 3. 2004 and 10. 12. 2004. First order has been passed by Deputy Collector, Handia, district Allahabad in Case No. 107 under Section 33/39 Land Revenue Act Durvijay Singh v. Shardadeen.

( 2 ) THE said case was initiated on the application of village Pradhan to the effect that certain Gaon sabha plots were wrongly entered in the name of petitioner in the revenue records and with the prayer that the said plots must be re-entered in the name of Gaon Sabha after expunging the name of petitioner. The Deputy Collector held that on perusal of records it was clear that without there being any order to that effect, Lekhpal illegally recorded the name of petitioner in khatauni. It is also mentioned therein that inquiry was got conducted by Lekhpal and Naib Tahsildar who reported that in C. H. Form No. 45 (prepared at the conclusion of consolidation operation) some plots in dispute were recorded as usar some as Navin Parti and plot No. 511 as pond. In the said order it is also mentioned that as entries are farzi, hence it is not necessary to hear the petitioner. Through the second order revision filed against the firs














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top