2005 Supreme(All) 10
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
S.R. Alam and Vikram Nath, JJ.
Sushila Pulp and Papers Ltd.
Versus
Official Liquidator
Special Appeal 53 of 2004
Decided On : 04 January 2005
Special Appeal 53 Of 2004
Anurag Khanna, KAMAL KRISHNA, R.N.Singh, R.P.AGRAWAL, S.G.HASNAIN, Shakti Swaroop Nigam,
After a company is ordered to be wound up, only the official liquidator can represent the company in legal proceedings.
Headnote:
Winding Up - Companies Act, 1956 - Section 20 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Rule 272 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959
Fact of the Case:
M/s. Sushila Pulp and Papers Ltd. faced problems soon after starting production and was directed to be wound up. The auction of its assets was contested by the managing director, leading to a legal battle over the valuation of the plant and machinery.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appeal filed by the managing director on behalf of the company in liquidation was not maintainable. Despite this, the court proceeded to examine the merits of the auction order and concluded that the price accepted for the sale of the plant and machinery was fair and adequate.
Issues: Maintainability of the appeal filed by the managing director on behalf of the company in liquidation, consideration of objections to the valuation reports, and adequacy of the price accepted for the sale of the plant and machinery.
Ratio Decidendi: After a company is ordered to be wound up, only the official liquidator can represent the company in legal proceedings. The court can accept a bid for the sale of assets if it makes a realistic appraisal of the factors and the price is fair and adequate.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merits, and no costs were awarded.
( 1 ) THIS special appeal has been filed by M/s. Sushila Pulp and Papers Ltd. , through its managing director Sri Girdhari Lal Tiwari praying for setting aside the order dated December 17, 2003, passed by the learned single judge in Misc. Application No. 119592 of 2002 arising out of Misc. Company Application No. 3 of 2000, whereby the plant and machinery of the company in liquidation has been auctioned in favour of M/s. S. S. Metals (respondent No. 4) and the sale was confirmed under rule 272 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.
( 2 ) M/s. Sushila Pulp and Papers Ltd. a company incorporated in 1991 under the Companies Act, 1956, was set up for manufacturing of paper. Soon after it started production it faced problems and is lying closed since 1993 and has not been doing any business since then. It was directed to be wound up by order of the company judge dated November 1, 2001, pursuant to the recommendation of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction, made under Section 20 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Pursuant to the winding up order the official liquidator took possession of the assets of the company. The liquidator, after taking possession, obtained the report from valuer approved by the court. The valuer submitted its report dated January 25, 2002. In the said valuation report the realisable value of the plant and machinery was shown to be Rs. 22,85,764. 50. Auction sale notice was published in the news papers inviting offers for sale of the assets of the company in liquidation to be submitted on or before July 17, 2002. Sri Girdhari Lal Tiwari, ex-managing director of the company in liquidation appeared and objected to the auction sale on the ground that the valuation shown in the report dated January 25, 2002, was very low and in fact the value was much more. The court permitted him to file the objection before the official liquidator before July 24, 2002, and the sale was adjourned.
( 3 ) SRI Girdhari Lal Tiwari, ex-managing director of the company in liquidation filed objections dated July 22, 2002, before the liquidator requesting for fresh valuation report and till then the proceedings of the sale may remain in abeyance.
( 4 ) PURSUANT to the said objection the liquidator called for a fresh report from valuer approved by the court and this time the valuer reported the net realisable value of the plant and machinery to be Rs. 17,00,000, vide valuation report dated April 7, 2003. The fresh valuation report having been obtained, notices were published in the newspapers again inviting offers by sealed tenders for sale of the assets of the company. As per the notice the inspection was permitted on november 28, 2003, and November 29, 2003, and the tenders were to be submitted by 1. 00 p. m. on December 17, 2003. They were to be opened at 2. 00 p. m. on the same day in the chambers of the company judge. The assets were divided in three lots. Lot No. 1 comprising land and building, lot No. 2 comprising plant and machinery and lot No. 3 was for the factory as a whole. On December 17, 2003, the tenders were opened. All the offers received were only in respect of lot No. 2, i. e. , plant and machinery. The minimum offer received was for Rs. 5. 25 lakhs and the highest offer was for Rs. 8. 11 lakhs.
( 5 ) THE company judge after considering the two valuation reports available and the bids offered which were not adequate asked the bidders to increase their bids. The bidders gradually increased their bids and finally M/s. S. S. Metals gave their final offer of purchasing the plant and machinery (in respect of lot No. 2) for Rs. 20 lakhs. As no other parties were willing to increase the bids further, the court accepted the bid of M/s. S. S. Metals not only in view of the fact that it was the highest bid but also considering the fact that it was more than the net realisable value given in the valuation report dated April 7, 2003. The auction purchaser M/s. S. S. Meta