SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 118

U.K.DHAON, KAMAL KISHORE
ARCHANA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates:
Abhinav N.Trivedi, Lalit Shukla, N.C.MEHROTRA, UMESH CHANDRA,

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Abhinav N. Trivedi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri N. C. Mehrotra, appearing on behalf of opposite-parties.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has alleged that a Scheme, known as "sharda Nagar Scheme" was launched by opposite-party No. 2 on 20th June, 1988, which was valid from 20th June, 1988 to 31st August, 1988, and the petitioner in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Brochure, deposited a sum of Rs. 20,000/- as registration fee, for purchase of a type plot on hire purchase basis. The petitioner has also alleged that in pursuance of the allotment letter, dated 22. 10. 1990, plot No. 1/109, Sector Rashmi Khand, Sharda Nagar Scheme, was allotted to the petitioner on the basis of a lottery, which was drawn on 27th July, 1990. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the rate of Rs. 370/- per sq. meter was mentioned in the Brochure, but in the allotment letter, dated 22. 10. 1990, the rate was revised by the opposite-parties from Rs. 370/- per sq. meter to Rs. 530/-per sq. meter, which was legally not permissible, as no such condition was contained in the brochure that the Development Authority, will be at liberty to increase the price of the land a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top