SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 302

ANJANI KUMAR
Leeladhar – Appellant
Versus
Additional District Judge – Respondent


Advocates:
C.L.CHAUDHRY,

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India been filed by the petitioner-tenant challenging the order dated 27. 1. 2001 passed by the trial Court and the order dated 14. 8. 2002 passed by the revisional Court, whereby the- revision filed by the petitioner-tenant has been dismissed. The facts leading to filing of the present writ petition are as under:

( 2 ) THAT the plaintiff-respondent filed a suit with the allegation that the defendant-petitioner is the tenant of two shops at the monthly rent of Rs. 200/- per month in the building No. 11/100 turkman Gate, Aligarh, which is owned by the plaintiff. That the petitioner-tenant has not paid rent since March, 1993. That a notice demanding rent and terminating his tenancy dated 23. 11. 1993 was served on him but in spite of service of the notice, neither rent was paid nor shop was vacated. The petitioner-tenant filed written statement wherein he has taken the stand that he is not the tenant of the plaintiff-respondent and that he himself is the owner of the land over which the property is situated which he has purchased from Smt; Harpyari Devi and the petitioner-tenant has constructed the shop









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top