SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 481

B.S.CHAUHAN, DILIP GUPTA
Rajendra Prasad SBrij Nath – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
K.C.Sinha, M.D.Mishra, R.P.SINGH,

B. S. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS special appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 2. 11. 2004 of the learned Judge disposing of the Writ Petition No. 46. 40 of 2004 filed by the petitioner against the order of transfer dated 11. 10. 2004 by directing that the petitioner will be permitted to remain in varanasi up to 31st May, 2005 considering the interest of children who are of the school going age in view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner on behalf of his client.

( 2 ) SHRI M. D. Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that petitioner-appellant is a class IV employee and he could bot be transferred in view of the transfer policy unless he has prayed in writing for transfer or he is being promoted; petitioner-appellant belongs to the scheduled Tribes and therefore, as per the Government Order contained in Annex. 2a, it was not permissible to transfer him; petitioner-appellant had been transferred in the mid academic session which had adversely affected the education of his children; transfer is because of mala fide of the higher authorities because of the fact that petitioner is a Scheduled Tribe candidate and other pers



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top