Back
2005 Supreme(All) 635
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
M.Devraj
RAM SAJIWAN
Versus
RAM BAHORI
Decided On : 07 April 2005
Revision No. 2 of 2003-04
The amendment in U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act rendered the second revision not maintainable.
Headnote:
Dismissal - Restoration Application - U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act - Second Revision Not Maintainable
Fact of the Case:
The revision was filed against the order dismissing the restoration application filed by the revisionist.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that as per the amendment made in U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act, the second revision is not maintainable.
Issues: The issue was whether the second revision is maintainable under the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the amendment made in U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act which rendered the second revision not maintainable.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision as not maintainable.
This revision has been filed against the order dated 6-6-2003 passed by Additional Commissioner, Allahabad in Revision No. 70 of 1997 by which the restoration application filed by revisionist has been dismissed.
2. Revisionist is absent. Perused the file carefully. It is clear from the file that first revision filed by the revisionist has already been dismissed. As per the amendment made in U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act which came into force w. e. f. 18-8-1997 second revision is not maintainable and hence this revision is hereby dismissed as not maintainable. Let this Courts file be consigned to record room.
Revision dismissed.
.
