SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 655

P.KRISHNA, R.K.AGRAWAL
Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Kay Kay Family Trust – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.Mahajan, Rakesh Ranjan Agarwal,

P. KRISHNA, J.

( 1 ) THE Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi at the instance of the Income tax Department has referred the following question of law under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for opinion to this Court:

"wheher on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Tribunal is right in holding that the assessing officer has no jurisdiction to change the status while making the assessment under Section 143 (1) and in that background whether a change in the status is appealable to the first appellate authority?"

( 2 ) THE assessment years 1986-87 to 1988-89 are involved in the present reference. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The assessee respondent had filed the income tax returns and claimed the status as "specified trust". The Income Tax Officer completed the assessment for all these years under Section 143 (1) of the Act. However, he while making the assessment under Section 143 (1) of the Act adopted the status as that of A. O. P. and charged tax at maximum marginal rate. The said assessment orders were Challenged by way of filing appeals before the Deputy Commissioner of income Tax (Appeals) and it was conten

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top