RAJES KUMAR, R.K.AGRAWAL
Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Rattan Lal – Respondent
1. Whether in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct to hold that if the order of the civil judge clearly spelled out that assessee had only l/5th share in the property then the assessees share was including it for the purpose of taxation to the extent of 1/5th only ?
2. Whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct to hold that when co-owners had not challenged the order of the Magistrate, it was not open to the Revenue to question the same while it is a cardinal principle of law that decisions of the civil courts were not binding on the Revenue who was not a party before the civil court ?
( 2 ) THE present reference relates to the assessment years 1984-85 to 1987-88.
( 3 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows: the respondent-assessee owns certain land at village Makkarabpur Palhera, Tehsil Sardhana, meerut, measuring 13 bighas, 5 biswas and 7 biswansi. The said land was a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.