SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 709

PRAKASH KRISHNA
Commissioner, Sales Tax – Appellant
Versus
Jagannath Dudadhar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.R.Tripathi, BHARAT JI AGRAWAL, PIYUSH AGRAWAL,

PRAKASH KRISHNA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against the order dated 21-5-1993 passed by the Trade Tax tribunal, Aligarh in Second Appeal No. 484 of 1992.

( 2 ) THE dealer opposite party deals in various Petroleum product. It has disclosed its turnover for the assessment year 1990-91 (Central) worth Rs. 6,99,92,448. 70 and admitted tax to the tune of rs. 16,13,422/ -. The dispute in the present revision is confined only to the rate of tax with regard to the turnover of Rs. 2,98,93,464/- of petroleum product. The dealer admitted the tax liability at the rate of 1% on the basis of Notification No. ST-11-2051 (2) (3)/88 dated 13-9-1990. This notification was amended by Notification No. 2380 dated 30-11-1990. Under this amended notification the commodity in question was taxable @ 4%. The assessing authority levied tax @ 4% under the amended notification on the turnover for the period December 1990 to March 1991. The said order was confirmed by the first appellate authority but UK Tribunal in the aforesaid Second appeal set aside the levy of tax @ 4% on the basis that the subsequent notification was published in the official gazette, but was not made available to the public at la










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top