SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 810

RAJES KUMAR
Indira Devi, Kamla Kant Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
NEERAJ SHARMA,

RAJES KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) BY way of present writ petition, petitioner has Challenged the appellate order dated 01. 03. 2004, annexure-4 and order dated 08. 10. 2004 annexure passed by the respondent No. 1 and the citation dated 24. 02. 2003.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts of the case are that under the new Excise Rules namely U. P. Excise (Settlement of licenses for retail sale of country liquor) Rules 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "rules, 2002)Settlement of country liquor shops of the district Allahabad for the Excise year 2002-03 took place under the supervision of the respondents No. 3 and 4. Under Rule, 2002 country liquor shop at Nawabganj district Allahabad was settled by lottery in favour of the petitioner in which mahesh Chandra Pandey was also one of the co-licencee. The shop was allotted on the application of the petitioner and intimation in this regard was given on 26 03. 2002 In pursuance of the aforesaid intimation petitioner deposited basic licence fee at Rs. 78,000/-, security money at Rs. 63,960/ -. The minimum guaranteed quota of the shop was 650 bulk litres per month, i. e. 7,800 bulk liters per month. The value of which had been fixed towards licenced fee or Rs. 6,39,600/ -.

(









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top