SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 923

Hari Prasad Gopi Krishna Jwellers Pvt. Limited through its Director Anoop Sarraf – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S.TIWARI, Gopal Chaturvedi, M.C.Chaturvedi, P.K.Sharma,

POONAM SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Gopal Chaturvedi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri M. C. Chaturvedi Advocate, for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.

( 2 ) COUNTER and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged and this application has come up for final hearing.

( 3 ) THE facts giving rise to the dispute is that Hari Prasad Gopi Krishna Jewelers Pvt. Limited had filed this application for release of certain articles seized by the opposite party no. 2 on the pointing out of Mr. Mukesh Agarwal, brother of Mukul Agarwal, opposite party No. 3. The f. I. R. was lodged in case Crime No. 600 of 1997, under Sections 457, 380 I. P. C. , Police Station nazibabad, District Bijnor on 20. 11 1997 against unknown persons and a list of stolen property was given to the Investigating Officer. During course of investigation, one accused namely angrej Singh was taken into custody, who admitted that he had committed theft in the shop of the applicant at Gorakhpur in the year 1994 and sold it to the opposite party no. 3 namely Dhani jewelers Chowk Bazar, Nazibabad, Police Station Nazibabad, District Bijnor and also disclosed that the stolen property from the shop of Dhani Jewelers, op







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top