SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 726

RAVINDRA SINGH
Anil Kumar Singh, Anil Singh, Rudra Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
BHAGWANT PRASAD, OM PRAKASH YADAV, Raj Nath Bhakta,

RAVINDRA SINGH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Bhagwant Prasad, Raj Nath Bhakta and Om Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A.

( 2 ) THIS application is filed with the following prayers:

" (i) stay the proceeding of the Criminal Case No. 187 of 2005, State v. Anil Singh, Under sections 419, 420, 467, 466 and 471 I. P. C. P. S. Anpare, District Sonbhadra, arising out of Case crime No. 363/04, Under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 I. P. C. State v. Anil Singh, p. S.-Anpara, District Sonbhadra.

(ii) set the applicant free on his personal bond, or admit him to ball;

(iii) pass any other order or direction deemed by the Honble Court just and proper in the interest of justice. "

( 3 ) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that an F. I. R. was lodged against the applicant by opposite party No. 8 Shri Gorakh Nath Yadav, Station Officer of police Station anpara, District Sonbhadra on 24. 1. 1. 2004 in Case Crime No. 363 of 2004 in which after investigation, the charge sheet dated 20. 1. 2005 has been submitted in the court of learned magistrate against the applicant for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 I. P. C. The applic








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top