SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1156

POONAM SRIVASTAVA
Indra Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Lt. Col. S. K. Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
MADHAV JAIN, Mridul Tripathi, P.K.Tripathi, R.N.Singh, Rahul Sripat, RAJUL BHARGAVA, Ravi Kant,

POONAM SRIVASTAVA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri R. N. Singh, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Rahul Sripat and Sri Rajul Bhargava, advocates appearing for the revisionist Smt. Indra Sharma in Civil Revision No. 83 of 2005. Sri ravi Kant, senior advocate, assisted by Madhav Jain, advocate appearing for the plaintiff respondents. Sri Murlidhar, senior advocate, assisted by Sri R. P. Singh, advocate appearing for the M/s. Guruji Motors Pvt. Ltd. in Civil Revision No. 84 of 2005 and one of the respondent in civil Revision No. 83 of 2005.

( 2 ) THE Civil Revision No. 83 of 2005 is filed by Smt. Indra Sharma and Civil Revision No. 84 of 2005 is on behalf of M/s. Guruji Motors Pvt. Ltd. and others. Two revisions are consolidated. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been exchanged. Record of the lower court was summoned by a special messenger, which is also placed before me. The record is available as such I proceed to decide these revisions finally.

( 3 ) BOTH the revisions have been filed challenging the ex parte judgment and decree dated 31. 1. 2005 passed by Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, Agra in S. C. C. Suit No. 9 of 2004 instituted by the Col. S. K. Sharma against the defendants M/s








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top