SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1255

ARUN TANDON
Jai Devi Hans – Appellant
Versus
Beena Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
G.C.SAXENA, Jai Shankar Audichya,

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Jai Shanker audichya Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Sri G. C. Saxena Advocate on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 3.

( 2 ) ONCE Sri Jitendra Pal Singh expired on 24th March, 2001. Smt. Beena Singh (respondent No. 1) claiming herself to be the wife of the said deceased, filed an application for issuance of succession certificate in respect of the amount due to Sri Jitendra pal Singh towards pay, gratuity, insurance etc. before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), farrukhabad. The application so filed was registered as Misc. Case No. 76 of 2001.

( 3 ) THE application was allowed under order of the Court dated 26-4-2001. In the said application, the petitioner namely Smt. Jai Devi, who is the mother of the deceased, was not impleaded as one of the defendants. Therefore, on coming to know about the order dated 26-4-2001, passed by the Civil judge, the mother (petitioner) filed an application for recall of the said order and for impleadment as defendants. The application so filed was allowed by the Court below and the petitioner (mother) was impleaded as one of the defendants in the succession application.

( 4 ) ON recor


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top