SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1223

S.U.KHAN
Jahar Singh son of Ram Dayal – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates:
AKHIL SHARMA, ANUPAM KULSHRESHTA, RAJEEV SHARMA, S.K.Mehrotra, V.K.SINGH,

S. U. KHAN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a review petition filed by the petitioner seeking review of my judgment and order dated 24. 3. 05 as modified on 24. 5. 05 on the application of Rajaram respondent No. 6 in the writ petition.

( 2 ) MATTER relates to preparation of final decree in respect of agricultural land jointly held by the petitioner and private respondents in the writ petition. The order of the Board of Revenue dated 28. 2. 05 challenged in the writ petition has the effect of directing the trial court to prepare fresh kuras (lots ). Initially the trial court had refused to accept the Kuras submitted by the Lekhpal. The said order was set aside in the revision by the Additional Commissioner, However, the order of Additional Commissioner was set aside by the Board of Revenue in revision. The effect of order of Board of Revenue is that trial court / S. D. O. is to re-determine Kuras.

( 3 ) THERE is absolutely no dispute regarding the shares, which have already been declared through preliminary decree.

( 4 ) IT appears that a particular plot of land is adjacent to road (National High Way) hence each party is very much keen to have that plot in his Kura (lot ). The contention of learne










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top