SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1347

ANJANI KUMAR
Girish Chandra Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
ATUL DAYAL, V.K.Agnihotri,

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

(1) BY means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, who are tenants of the accommodation in question, have challenged the order dated 19th May, 2001, passed by the revisional court in S. C. C. Revision No. 119 of 1999, copy whereof is annexed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition, whereby the revisional court allowed the revision filed by the respondents-landlord against the order dated 30th March, 1999, passed by the Judge, Small Cause Courts by which the trial court dismissed the suit filed by the respondents-landlord.

(2) THE facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the respondents-landlord filed a suit being S. C. C. Suit No. 618 of 1993 before the trial court for arrears of rent and ejectment against the tenants-petitioners on the ground that the tenants are in arrears of rent for more than four months and further that the tenants have made structural changes in the accommodation in question. The landlord therefore served a notice demanding the rent after terminating the tenancy of the tenants. It is further contented that since neither rent was paid, nor the premises has been vacated by the tenant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top