SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1389

RAVINDRA SINGH
Sonu Pal, Awadh Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashutosh Srivastava, VINOD SINHA,

RAVINDRA SINGH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Vinod Sinha learned counsel for the applicant, learned A. G. A. and Sri Ashutosh srivastava learned counsel for the complainant.

( 2 ) FROM the perusal of the recored it reveals that in the present case the applicant is Devar of the prosecutrix. The F. I. R. was lodged by the prosecutrix Smt Shashi Pal against the applicant and co-accused Rakesh Pal (husband), Awadh Pal father-in-law and Smt Rani Pal mother-in-law on 12. 5. 2005 under Section 498-A, 323, 506, 376 and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Crime no. 139 of 2005 District Allahabd. According to prosecution version the marriage of the prosecutrix was solemnized with the co-accused Rakesh Pal on 13. 2. 2001. Soon after the marriage the applicant and other co-accused persons started beating the prosecutrix to fulfill the demand of colour T. V. , refrigerator and Rs. 50,000/ -. In the mean time the prosecutrix became pregnant and she gave birth a female child who died after six days of her birth because the prosecutrix was subjected to cruelty before her birth. The prosecutrix was sent to her parents house. Thereafter a panchayat was arranged. Again she came to the house of her in-laws where







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top