S.N.SRIVASTAVA
Meharwan son of Rahman – Appellant
Versus
Collector, The Tehsildar, Tehsildar Sikandara and The Gaon Sabha through its – Respondent
( 1 ) ORDERS impugned herein having been passed on similar lines and proceedings in all the petitions having genesis in Section 122 B of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act, all the six petitions were knit together to be heard and decided by a composite orders. In all these cases, notices were issued to the respective petitioners in form 49 Ka of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act the quintessence of which is that the petitioners were in unauthorized possession over Gaon Sabha property and they had wrongly constructed residential houses on a part of the same and further that they were liable to be evicted as well as to pay damages to the extent indicated in the orders. Objections were filed by each of the petitioners. By order-dated 28. 6. 2004, the Tahsildar passed an order for eviction of the petitioners from the land in question together with direction to pay damages. Revision preferred against the said order ended up in dismissal vide order of the District magistrate Kanpur Dehat.
( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioners canvassed that each of the petitioners preferred objection claiming to be in actual possession prior to the date of vesting. It was argued that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.