SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1413

UMESHWAR PANDEY
JAMIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates:
Amicus Curiae, B.S.Shrinet, N.O.Rai, SHISHIR TANDON,

UMESHWAR PANDEY, J.

This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of conviction dated 28-2-2004 passed by Special Judge, Allahabad, convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotic Substance Act (hereinafter referred to as N. D. P. S. Act) and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for a term of ten years and also to pay a fine of Rs. One Lac.

2. The appellant is said to have been found in possession of contraband, 950 tablets of Dizapam. The search party had received information while on patrol duty on 18-12-1997 through an informer that the accused was carrying contraband drug and if steps are taken quickly, recovery can be affected. C. W. 1 Padmakar Rai Incharge of Surajkund Police Outpost under Allahabad Kotwali alongwith other subordinate staff including P. W. 1 constable Kamlesh Babu Mishra proceeded for the spot and on arrival the informer indicated towards the appellant who noticed the presence of the police party and tried to escape, but P. W. 1 warned him to stop at which he started running away, but after a chase of 20-30 paces he was apprehended at 11 p. m. He disclosed his name as Jamil and when the suspicion


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top