R.K.RASTOGI, YATINDRA SINGH
Veena Bahl – Appellant
Versus
Vishnu Kumar – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the order dated 23. 4. 2005, passed by Sri Akhilesh Chandra Sharma, learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Court No. 10, Moradabad in Original Suit No. 319 of 1982, Smt. Veena Bahl and Ors. v. Sri Vishnu Kumar and Ors.
( 2 ) THE facts relevant for disposal of this appeal are that the plaintiffs Smt. Veena Banal, Smt. Rarnwati Devi and Smt. Rajeshwari Devi Rastogi (now all deceased) filed O. S. No. 319 of 1982 in the court of Civil Judge, Moradabad, against the defendants Sri Vishnu Kumar and Ors. with these allegations that the properties specified in Schedule a and b were owned by Raja krishan Kumar and his son Raja Raj Kumar who jointly executed a registered deed of transfer on 6. 8. 1896 in favour of Anirudh Kumar and Lal Kumar. It was further provided in that deed that the property shall not be transferred to any non-member of the family so long as the members of the family were ready to take it. Sri Lal Kumar died unmarried and thereafter Sri anirudh Kumar also died and so the property was inherited by his son Jagdish Kumar. Jagdish kumar also died on 22. 3. 1932 and he was succeeded by his widow Smt. Surendra Bala Devi.
Smt. Siba Rani Devi and Ors. v. Ramendra Nath Mukherjee and Ors.
Madan Mohan v. Tejram George Coronation Hindu School Association and Ors.
Smt. Bibbi and Anr. v. Shugan Chand and Ors.
Chief Inspector of Stamps v. Shanti Devi AIR 1956 All 168
Smt. Sabina alias Farida v. Mohd. Abdul Wasit
Mahant Purshottam Dass v. Har Narain
Kailash Chand v. Vth A.C.J. Meerut and Ors.
Referred to : Chief Inspector of Stamps v. Mahant Laxmi Narain
State of U.P. v. Ramkrishan Burman
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.