SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1712

MUKTESHWAR PRASAD
Sureshwati, Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
AMIT KRISHNAN, B.DAYAL, M.K.Gupta, R.B.Singhal, Vishnu Sahai,

MUKTESHWAR PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS first appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the act) by Smt. Sureshwati (claimant) is directed against the judgment and decree dated 24. 1. 2001 passed by District Judge, Gautam Budh Nagar whereby he found that neither the claimant nor M/s NSR Farms Pvt. Ltd. is entitled to receive compensation in respect of Khasra no. 554/3 area 5-0-0 Bighas situate in village Geja Tilaptabad, Pargana and Tehsil Dadri, district Gautam Budh Nagar and the land in question would be deemed to have been resumed by the State.

( 2 ) IN brief, the facts of the case giving rise to this appeal are as under:it appears that the land recorded as Khasra No. 554/3 area 5-0-0 Bighas situate in village Geja tilaptabad, Pargana and Tehsil Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar was acquired for the planned development of New Okhla Industrial Development Authority. In the Revenue records, the name of Smt. Sureshwati, widow of Shri Ram, was recorded as Bhumidhar with non- transferable rights. Therefore, the compensation under Section 11 of the Act was prepared in her name. However, M/s NSR Farms Pvt. Ltd. 11, Sadhna Enclave, New Delhi preferred






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top