SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 1939

MUKTESHWAR PRASAD
LIYAKAT GOOJAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates:
Bahar Ali,

MUKTESHWAR PRASAD, J.

This criminal appeal by accused Liyakat Goojar from jail has been filed against the judgment and order dated 1-4-2004 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Barabanki whereby he convicted the accused under Section 8 read with Section 21 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the act) and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of rupees one lac. In default in payment of fine, he was ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a further period of two years.

2. In brief, the facts of the case, which led to the trial of the appellant, are as under.

3. On 12-10-1994, S. I. Qazi Ahmad Ibrahim, the then S. O. Police Station Jaidpur, District Barabanki accompanied by police personnel was returning to the police station on Government vehicle. At about 3. 40 a. m. , the police party arrived at Takiya Crossing and saw someone concealing near the well. On suspicion, the S. O. questioned him. Thereafter, he started running. He was overpowered by the police party and on interrogation disclosed his name as Liyakat Goojar. He was wanted by the police in case crime No. 298/93, under




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top