SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 2061

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Irshad Hussain
RINKOO ALIAS KISHAN LAL
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL
Decided On : 26 October 2005
Criminal Appeal No. 895 of 2001

Advocates:
A.S.PAL, AMIT BHATT, Anurag Bisaria, J.C.Gupta, Mridul Kumar Rakesh, RAMJI SRIVASTAVA, Vinod Sharma,

The judgment emphasizes the importance of credible evidence and the need to prove charges beyond a reasonable doubt, especially in cases involving serious offenses like rape.

Headnote:

Rape - Criminal Law - IPC 452, 363/511, 363, 366, 506, 376 - The court acquitted the accused of charges under Sections 363/366/506/376 IPC and maintained their conviction and sentence under Section 452 IPC and Section 363/511 IPC. The accused were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and fined Rs. 5,000 each under Section 452 IPC and three years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 5,000 each under Section 363/511 IPC. The sentences were to run concurrently.

Fact of the Case:

The accused were convicted and sentenced for various offenses including house trespass, kidnapping, and rape. The incident involved an attempt to kidnap a minor, followed by the kidnapping and alleged rape of another minor who was mentally retarded.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty of house trespass and attempting to kidnap one minor, but acquitted them of charges related to the kidnapping and alleged rape of the mentally retarded minor. The court also maintained the conviction and sentence for the charges of house trespass and attempted kidnapping.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the credibility of witness testimony, the reliability of medical evidence, and the circumstances of the alleged crimes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the evidence presented was not sufficient to prove the charges of kidnapping and rape beyond a reasonable doubt. The court also raised doubts about the credibility of witness testimony and the reliability of the medical evidence. As a result, the accused were acquitted of the more serious charges but convicted for the lesser offenses.

Final Decision: The accused were acquitted of charges related to the kidnapping and alleged rape of the mentally retarded minor, but their conviction and sentence for house trespass and attempted kidnapping were maintained.

IRSHAD HUSSAIN, J.

Both these accused stand convicted and sentenced to undergo R. I. for three years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 452 I. P. C. ; three years R. I. and fine of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 363/ 511 I. P. C. ; three years R. I. and fine of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 363 I. P. C. ; seven years R. I. and fine of Rs. 10,000/ - under Section 366 I. P. C. ; one years R. I. under Section 506 I. P. C. and im prisonment for life and fine of Rs. 50,000/- each under Section 376 I. P. C. and in default of payment of fine to further undergo R. I. for a period of 1/3rd of the period of sentence awarded on each count, per judgment dated 30-8-2000 passed by the Additional Ses sions Judge, Dehradun in sessions trial no. 73/ 1999. The sentences were di rected to run concurrently and it was further directed that on realization of fine, a sum of Rs. 80,000/- shall be paid as compensation to the victim of the rape.

2. The facts of the case may be briefly stated as under :

Both the accused aged about 18-19 years are residents of village Harbhajanwala of P. S. Kotwali, Dehradun. Their village is situate near village Solabeegha, Patti Mehuwala within the circle of Police Reporting Out Post, Patel Nagar of the town of Dehradun, where informant Suresh Lal (P. W. 3) was residing with his family members consisting of his wife Smt. Deveshwari (P. W. 2), one son Rajesh and two daughters, Km. Sushma (P. W. 1) and Km. Rajani, who is men tally retarded and is the alleged victim of kidnapping and rape.

3. In the night between 5/6-4-1999 informant Suresh Lal and his wife were sleeping in one room and whereas the son and two daughters were sleeping in the adjoining room. At about 12. 30 in the night both these accused entered in the room of the children after breaking-open its door and made an attempt to forcibly kidnap Km. Sushma. On the hue and cries and alarm raised by the children Suresh Lal and his wife woke up and reached the room of the chil dren. Km. Sushma was rescued from being kidnapped and taken away by these accused. Suresh Lal was even successful in catching hold of accused Rinkoo but was given teeth bite in one of the fingers of the left hand and in the process this accused got

himself freed and ran away along with his compan ion accused David. The incident caused noise all around and the neigh bours of the informant were also awak ened.

4. Informant Suresh Lal out of fear bf the accused decided to take shelter in the house of his one of the neigh bour Sukh Bahadur (P. W-7 ). Suresh Lal, his wife, son and elder daughter however forgot to take the younger daughter Km. Rajani with them and she continued to remain in the room of the house of the informant which was raided by these accused. After some time both the accused again reached there on a motorcycle no. U. P. 07a-5396 and started knocking the door of the room in which Suresh Lal and oth ers have taken shelter/accused started striking bricks on the shutter to have the same opened but they could not suc ceed in their attempt. Both the accused however went towards the room of the house of the informant and picked up Km. Rajani to take her away from there. Suresh Lal, his wife and neigh bours namely Sukh Bahadur, Ram Bahadur and Khadak Bahadur came out to rescue Km. Rajani from these accused out they were given threat of death by the accused by use of fire arm. The accused were thus successful in kidnapping Km. Rajani who was taken away from there by these ac cused on the motorcycle. Suresh Lal and others thereafter went out towards Arcadia Tea Estate in search of Km. Rajani and after about 1 hour Km. Rajani in a naked state was seen com ing towards the house from the side of the tea estate. She had scratches on her face and chest and was bleeding from her private part. However despite search both the accused could not be traced but their motorcycle was found lying abandoned in the tea estate. Km. Rajani was provided another pair of clothes by the informant and she was taken to













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top