SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 2147

S.U.KHAN
Vijay Kumar and Krishna Kumar, Satya Prakash – Appellant
Versus
IInd Additional District Judge – Respondent


Advocates:
H.S.Nigam, RAVI KIRAN JAIN, S.S.Nigam,

S. U. KHAN, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENTS 3 to 10 Smt. Padmawati and Ors. filed a release application in respect of building in dispute which is a shop under Section 12/16 of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972. In the release application it was stated that M/s Kesarmal Mohanlal and Shri Mohan Lal who were the tenants of the shop in dispute had sublet the shop to petitioners Vijay Kumar and Krishna Kumar. In the release application initialy petitioners were not impleaded as parties. However, they appeared in the said proceedings and stated that they were the valid tenants of the shop in dispute. Petitioners prayed for regularization of their tenancy. In the release application respondents 11 to 22 were impleaded as opposite parties and it was stated that they were co-owners but had no interest in being impleaded as applicants in the release application. In the release application the need set up was for Sushil Kumar Gupta - respondent No. 7. It was also stated therein that respondents 11 to 22 had no objection to the release of the shop in dispute to Sri Sushil Kumar Gupta. The case was registered before R. C. and E. O. /d. S. O. , Saharanpur as Case petitioners tenancy stood regularized and they coul













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top