SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 2247

A.K.YOG, PRAKASH KRISHNA
Union of India (UOI) through Central Organisation of Railway Electrification – Appellant
Versus
Union of India (UOI) through Secretary, Ministry of Finance – Respondent


( 1 ) THE title and description of the present petition is interesting one. It is Union of India v. Union of India. We do not know who is fighting and against, whom. It is sad that the learned Counsel appearing for Union of India and opposed by another counsel representing Union of India is not aware of the Supreme Courts judgments namely Oil and natural Gas Commission and Anr. v. CCE (1994) 116 CTR (SC) 643 : 1995 Supp (4) SCC 541 (paras 3 and 4) followed subsequently in the case of Chief Conservator of Forests, Govt. of AP v. Collector and Ors. AIR2003 SC 1805 , 2003 (4 )ALD27 (SC ), [2003 (2 )JCR175 (SC )], JT2003 (5 )SC 210 , (2003 )2 MLJ57 (SC ), 2003 (2 )SCALE429 , (2003 )3 scc472. For convenience paras 3 and 4 of Oil and Natural Gas Commission and Anr. (supra) are reproduced below :

( 2 ) WE direct that the Government of India shall set up a Committee consisting of representatives from the Ministry of Industry, the Bureau of Public Enterprises and the Ministry of Law, to monitor disputes between Ministry and Ministry of Government of India, Ministry and public sector undertakings of the Government of India and public sector undertakings in between themselves, to ensure that n







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top