SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(All) 2488

A.K.YOG, PRAKASH KRISHNA
Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
B. L. Garg – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.Mahajan, R.R.AGRAWAL, S.CHOPRA, Suyash Agrawal,

A. K. YOG, PRAKASH KRISHNA, JJ.

( 1 ) THESE two references were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment as the question of law and facts are overlapping with each other. The Income Tax Appellate tribunal has made these references under Section 256 (1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The following question of law has been referred in Income tax Reference No. 25 of 1997 for the assessment year 1988 -89:whether scholarship given to the students of employees of the Co. be included in the assessee s income?

( 2 ) WHEREAS in the Income Tax Reference No. 104 of 1995, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, meerut has referred the following question for the assessment year 1988-89:whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ITAT was legally correct in confirming the order of the lower Appellate Authority by allowing scholarship to the assessees son as exempt?

( 3 ) THE facts of both the above references are identical and the Tribunal while deciding the appeal in the case of Shri Y. K. Seth, giving rise to the reference No. 104 of 1995, has followed its earlier order passed in the case of Shri B. L. Garg giving rise to the refer



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top