MARKANDEY KATJU, K.N.OJHA
Sheikh Khalikuzzama (D) through L. Rs. – Appellant
Versus
Sheikh Akhtaruzzama (D) – Respondent
M. Katju and K. N. Ojha, JJ.—This first appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mirzapur dated 9.12.2003 in Suit No. 177 of 1995.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants has not gone into the merits of the findings of the court below and instead he has submitted that before the judgment was delivered on 9.12.2003, the plaintiffs appellants had moved application dated 7.10.2003 praying for withdrawal of the suit. Earlier he had filed application dated 8.9.2003
praying for withdrawal of the suit, but in that application he had prayed for liberty to file a fresh suit. However, in the second application dated 7.10.2003, he has not prayed for liberty to file a fresh suit. It is uncontroverted that the application dated 7.10.2003 was indeed filed in the court below before the impugned judgment dated 9.12.2003 was delivered.
3. The plaintiff in a suit is dominus litus. He has paid court fee of the suit. Hence as held by the Division Bench decision in Smt. Raisa Sultana Begam v. Abdul Qadir, AIR 1966 All 318, he has an absolute right to withdraw his suit at any time before the judgment is delivered, vide Order XXIII, Rule 1, C.P.C. It
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.