SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 936

MARKANDEY KATJU, R.S.TRIPATHI
Reflex Industries – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Petitioners: S. K. Gupta.
Counsel for the Opposite Parties : C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

M. Katju, J.—This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5 to release the petitioner’s factory at D-100 Sector II, NOIDA, District Gautambudh Nagar and to restrain respondents from interfering with the petitioner’s business carried out in the aforesaid factory.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The facts of the case are that respondent No. 3 Smt. Poonam Suri purchased the industrial plot in question along with building thereon from the previous owner M/s. Wazid Sons Exports Ltd., New Delhi by a registered sale deed dated 23.6.1987. The respondent No. 4 was allegedly in occupation of the said premises as tenant under its earlier owner M/s. Wazid Sons Exports Ltd. and as such he became the tenant of the respondent No. 3 by operation of law. The respondent Nos. 3 and 4 decided to enter into fresh terms of tenancy and as such executed a registered lease deed dated 17.7.1987 with respect to the aforesaid disputed plot on a monthly rent of Rs. 10,000 vide Annexure-1. Respondent No. 4 who was only the tenant of respondent No. 3 handed over possession of the disputed premises to respondent No. 3 on 10.4.1997 and respondent No










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top