K. N. Ojha, J.—Civil Revision No. 163 of 2004 is preferred against the order dated 18.10.2004 passed by Incharge District Judge, Etah in Misc. Case No. 9 of 2004 arising out of small causes suit (SCC Suit) No. 10 of 2002 and order dated 28.9.2004 passed by the District Judge, Etah in s.C.c. Suit No. 10 of 2002 Smt. Vishwa Mohini v. Smt. Khilla Devi alias Manju Singh.

2. Since both revisions are related to each other therefore they are being finally disposed of by a common order.

3. Heard Sri Sashi Nandan learned senior counsel for the revisionist assisted by Km. Pooja Agarwal, advocate and Sri Swapnil Kumar learned counsel for the respondents.

4. The fact of the case is that Smt. Vishwa Mohini filed suit for arrear of rent and ejectment bearing S.C.C. No. 10 of 2002, Smt. Vishwa Mohini v. Smt. Khilla Devi. Smt. Vishwa Mohini claimed herself to be the owner and landlady of the house in question and alleged to have purchased the house from one Naresh Chand Saxena and gave information to the tenant Smt. Khilla Devi who according to the landlady was tenant in the said premises on rent of Rs. 700 per month. The case of defendant Smt. Khilla Devi was that per month rent was Rs.30